Spiritual Offset

What do Leonardo DiCaprio, the Pope, Aer Lingus and Ian Paisley have in common? Read on and find out.

Carbon offset purchasing has been a somewhat controversial if pragmatic solution towards climate change.  Back in April, Andrew Revkin writing in his International Herald Tribune column quoted Denis Hayes of the Bullit Foundation:

“The worst of the carbon-offset programs resemble the Catholic Church’s sale of indulgences back before the Reformation,” said Denis Hayes, the president of the Bullitt Foundation, an environmental grant-making group. “Instead of reducing their carbon footprints, people take private jets and stretch limos, and then think they can buy an indulgence to forgive their sins. ….This whole game is badly in need of a modern Martin Luther…”

What can I say? Someone in the eternal city must have been reading the IHT and had a light bulb or two go off. Guess who is setting up shop for brisk business in indulgences at the Greenpeace festival in Waveney this weekend? Head Office is also separately getting in on the act by declaring this Sunday ‘Save Creation Day’ according to the Beeb.

Not that the Holy See is being complacent about climate change, while it is clearing the path for us to the eternal, it is also still managing it’s own carbon footprint back here on this mortal coil. Last month the Vatican announced a massive carbon offset programme in Hungary towards becoming the first carbon neutral sovereign nation on earth. Then this week with spiritual and physical offsets all in place the Vatican announced it’ entry into the airline business. With the environment dimension accounted for how well is this venture doing on the social and economic dimensions of sustainability? It’s a mixed bag, the inaugral flight was not without it’s customer relations issues when pilgrims were prohibited from taking holy water on board. Even the vatican is not immune to the anti terror security gauntlet at airports these days.  God’s reputation for price optimisation and overall yield management also took a drubbing from the people at Ryanair, now the competition in more ways than you might imagine:

“Ryanair already performs miracles that even the Pope’s boss can’t rival, by delivering pilgrims to Santiago de Compostela for the heavenly price of €10”

So there is a great deal more to sustainability than technical environmental management, measurement and offset. Even the vatican must face competition, socio political externalities and return on capital hurdles to sustain this business. Spare a thought then for poor Leonardo DiCaprio who had to face an unexpected and multi dimensional sustainability question this week from Kate Coe of the Grist at the Time Warner launch of The 11th Hour. The question: is 11th Hour a union movie?  Answer:  err… no.

Kate’s objection is this:

‘ …..it’s impossible to discuss — and attack — climate change without addressing issues of social class and economy. Encouraging conscious consumerism without addressing the underlying class and labor issues is irresponsible — no matter how green the product, how progressive the process.’

It was a bit harsh but it does underline an important point we see in abundance in the aviation business and elsewhere. Taxes, voluntary or otherwise, may not be an effective method to reduce consumption. Ryanair say it isn’t here and I think they are probably right. So does the extra cost associated with an offset or tax amount to an indulgence for the wealthy and an object of exclusion for the poor? Tread carefully the politician who tries to take away our access to air travel. Also tread carefully the business who sells carbon off sets or other environmental premiums. With still immature standards for carbon markets, assuring consumers so to maintain confidence of the bottom up consumer led action on climate change is paramount. See AccountAbility’s excellent report What Assures Consumers On Climate Change? here.

Consider the plight of Aer Lingus. Last year Ryanair attempted to take over the airline just one week after it was floated and currently holds a 29% holding. In recent weeks it has tried to force Aer Lingus to call an EGM to force a reversal of it’s decision to transfer it’s Shannon to Heathrow service to Belfast where it will set up a new base with new and less favourable labour conditions. The Irish government also holds 25% and employees another 22%. The opposition party and local politicians have placed Aer Lingus and the government under immense pressure to U turn in the interests of the economic & social welfare of the west of Ireland region. If I was cynical I might assume Ryanair would prefer to see Aer Lingus struggle to operate the less profitable Shannon – London route in head to head competition than move to the more profitable base in Belfast.  Aer lingus has rejected Ryanair’s call for an EGM as they believe listening to their number one shareholder also the number one competitor on this issue would be a breach of competition law and that Ryanair’s true motive is to destroy shareholder value at EI.

So aside from the environmental stakeholders, Aer Lingus is also finding itself juggling the competing & conflicted demands of customers, politicians, shareholders, employees whilst trying to stay within the framework of good corporate governance. Even the church, without the divisions of reformation this time, has gotten involved in this unholy row. No wonder, CEO Dermot Mannion had a jittery PR launch in Belfast. Look here for an hilarious picture from the event. Which finally brings us to Ian Paisley. It’s a huge political breakthrough that Ian Paisley now shares power in Northern Ireland with Sinn Fein in a devolved government. Nothing short of miraculous and personally having grown up in Ireland during the troubles not something I ever thought possible. I don’t know what Ian Paisley thinks about the sustainability performance of either Aer Lingus or the Vatican though we all remember well his infamous heckling of the Pope at the European Parliament in Strasbourg back in 1988. Seems like a lifetime ago. Watch it here.

And speaking of things never thought possible, what is the point of all this? It’s all to say that sustainability and stakeholder management is a complicated and long game. It may seem intractable and dare I compare them but so too did the problems of Northern Ireland. Some ideas will fall by the way side, others will catch on and go to strength. Climate change is a huge problem but maybe it is just about possible for us to find in time not just a technical solution but a solution that also addresses all the associated social, political and economic issues.

In the meantime, it is critical for all major organisations whether business, government or even the church to have antenna up, information on hand and be at the ready to engage intelligently with increasingly enabled and informed stakeholders.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s